Sunday, November 6, 2016

the drawing - an essay / poetry in the dark · the sonnet


Last night i was screamed at by an Argentinian in Montevideo, Uruguay. He was so beside himself that he placed his hands on my throat screaming “pinche puta” - I had knocked on his door asking him to turn down his television sound - he is not a bad guy, but I now have trouble considering him anything but foe - my defect, not his. The blowback of this unfortunate event is that I am no longer seeking immigration to this nation of determined individuals; i do not feel welcomed - my problem. What I face from my decision, is returning in shame to my own country and those in my family who are barely able to acknowledge my existence, much less sympathize with my confusion for having yet again angered someone. In solidarity with self-care I sought consolation from one of my friends here; I went seeking compassion, but learned instead that his estranged father had died days earlier. In the process of trying to understand what he was facing, I learned that his loyalty to dying family, was sorely taxed after visit with a fellow émigré, dying horribly disfigured from a burn accident. I’m at a loss as to how to comfort someone I know only by instinct, much less understand. My friend is brilliant, sensitive and besotted; he says from wine; my sense is it is from grief - a deep profound unresolved ancient hurt. It is his bravery and generosity of spirit which attracted me to him as friend, and for my own dearth of compassion prevents me from plumbing my own misery such that I might understand his. So I reach out to you, the countless many facing tragedies and pain seeking ways to relieve your own suffering, or for the luckiest of you, the suffering of others. You are not alone, nor do I believe this essay to be the end of our shared misery, after all we are on the “information super highway to hell.” I feel barely able, as Bob Dylan described, “grind my life out steady and sure,” so how would i deflect the shame my people would make of my return to a land I had once been willing to give my life for, but now will only feel loyalty to The Water Protector heroes of Standing Rock. The country of my youth no longer exists, much like the family of my memory. But this essay is about a drawing which does exist; it does so because I created it. It is not computer generated, but drawn freehand from a photo on a computer. Nor did I take the photo; it had been retrieved and drawn with permission from someone else’s story line - a story line I’d like to have become a part of, but must instead accept as the limit of an unrequited love - the drawing mostly a bookend to an internet-fueled fantasy.

Is the act of drawing enough? Can determined creativity supplant the rapidly evolving reality that interpersonal skills, so desperately necessary for the survival of our species, are being undermined by a narrow spectrum of self reference such that I could delude myself into believing a woman might understand my heart from drawings found on a computer, or that a neighbor might think it his right to place his hands on my person for asking him to turn down his noise? I don’t have any answers; guessing has become so convoluted by unknowns and distortions, I’m barely able to discern the pale outlines of my own being - much less know how I might, in a foreign nation, comfort an émigré from a different culture who I imagine is in denial about grief. I am imagining, or projecting my own suffering, but with concern. That effort to understand is for me the charm of drawing the human portrait, particularly women. It is as though in order to accurately depict the nuance in a woman’s face, I must find feelings within myself which understand, or correspond to what I see; I do not seek congruence which would presume knowledge about another that is impossible to know without intimate communication. As much as I seek that level of communication, it is rare for me; nor am I sure why. I do know that to clearly see someone other than myself is among the keys to compassion of which there is precious little left in the supercharged assertions of our mighty leaders hell-bent for the destruction of our planet. If I am able, through patience and determination, to process ever closer to the expression and demeanor of relative strangers; I may grow to see myself as one with all - to become more than an aging artist facing his demise, but one in solidarity with resistance to the completely unnecessary extinction of his kind. Pema Chodron says to face the pain of existential emptiness. I feel this condition of solitude is prevalent in our current material culture - to find a way to embrace and hold “just a second longer” the grief that consumes our lives is a welcome ability

I don’t understand entirely why, but drawing and writing give me happiness - a feeling of belonging that I’ve yet to find in any material object, social construct or spiritual adherence. It is the absence of self i am drawn to, the absorption found in consciousness outside of the shrill “I” which haunts so much of our physical existence - “I” don’t understand, “I” love you, Can “I” help you? - the seemingly endless ego one instinctively knows - just like a bad friend - means you no good. Is it possible to sever ties with that self-serving little puke, or would we become emotional eunuchs without the sea-anchor of love in a love-hungry world? The drawing i’ve just finished, or think i’ve finished and about which i’m attempting to describe, is not my first visit to this subject. It is not possible to describe why her features seem to me a universe, indecipherable, but obvious in her majesty. My previous efforts were hampered more by ego, and its incessant scrutiny. But with enough distance, and despair, it became possible to be merely the point of the pencil seeking an appropriate place to better describe beauty. Is that how all wholesome activity manifests - the instant where potential and awareness join in service of depicting a beauty we all intrinsically feel, or at least those not subsumed by delusions of permanence - the fiction that enough gold will buy you, or your bloodline, any spot other than the one foretold by your birth into this mortal merry go round. When i finally understood that no matter how lovingly, or accurately i depicted the face of my obsession, our fates would be forever divergent, i was freed from romantic delusion, or more accurately - my ambition was transfigured, and i became a witness to others for the simple joy of beauty - if it is possible for beauty to be understood any more than love.

If we don’t find a way back to a deep and abiding appreciation for both love and beauty free of the coerced commercialization which corporate consumer pandering has foisted on our lesser appetites, we shall be removed from existence by our own emptiness and greed. I find this tragically sad, for we are born in wonder, with an innate capacity for love, and easy appreciation for beauty, both traits we possess in abundance. Am i recommending all who read this take up pencil and paper and become absorbed by some expression which cannot be found by any other voice? I would say not, unless you’re crazy, or determined or both. Will it help you? Meditation and prayer are likely more suitable vehicles for personal growth, especially if you find comfort in the company of hordes. Our world knows, like a dying person, “something” is about to change very drastically; but once again the profiteers are one step ahead, so rather than serve the worker on the line giving her/his all in mind-numbing contribution to a system never intended for benefit to anyone but the owners, our spiritual leaders are charging prohibitive prices for services rendered and opening boutique yoga centers in Bali, training corporate executives in mindfulness, and cavorting with celebrities driven by some delusion if they pray hard enough, their narcissistic quest for pelf will be construed as offerings by whatever omniscient entity sent to sweep up the remnants of humanity. Then again, i may be just another hater venting my spleen rather than doing the hard work necessary to remain open-hearted; i don’t know. I know that by writing of my fears and concerns with some hope of creating a cogent thread of love, there is a chance what i say may be of some service to someone. Prose, like a bad drawing, readily shows flaws at a glance, so a reader will know whether what i say has personal correspondence and is of value, or gibberish. It matters not to me, for it is in the act of creating without attachment to an outcome in which i find salvation. 

Michelangelo had said of carving “every stone has a statue inside of it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it; ” Lao Tzu - “To attain knowledge, add things every day. To attain wisdom, subtract things every day.” I have seen “The Dying Slave” by Michelangelo, and clearly he was a very wise man; he was wise to see the relationship of death to slavery and express it such that anyone could ponder the meaning of freedom, perhaps to see it as more than a jingo for football half-time spectacles paid for with your tax dollar. Freedom for Michelangelo, i imagine, came from the discipline of creativity. Carving is a reductive process. However, the act of drawing, painting and writing are born of a “Tabula Rasa” - blank slate. I’m not sure which is the more challenging, having done both. It may be i’ll never understand Lao Tzu, or be wise, which may have been his intention. However, i am fascinated by the creative process of accretion which somehow miraculously coalesces into a character or a train of thought recognizable and made whole out of aether. Lao Tzu also said “Do you have the patience to wait ’til your mud settles and the water is clear? Can you remain unmoving ’till the right action arises by itself?” Writing and drawing provide me a platform on which to wait patiently for “my mud to clear”. It is not uncommon for me to pick up a particular pencil to make a particular mark, only to find it was not at all the right color or even the mark i wanted. By this example, a final drawing might be considered clear water; in which case i am learning to be patient and to not make lines simply from a desire to move forward, but waiting for the right action. Writing is very similar in so far as the next thought can only be written once the previously developed logic dictates further meaning - if that makes sense. For example there was a time i relied on outlines for both processes, drawing as well as writing. I needed the security of some sense of foresight about the work. I imagine it is residue from a socialization which advocates optimum outcome leading to success. Is it the same with life? If by acting from a predetermined vision - a structure within which we restrict our innate curiosity and awareness, are we not robbing ourselves of the freedom and joy found from simply being in the moment?


+-+-+-

poetry in the dark · the sonnet

"I'm writing now without electricity", 
and not, for that had newly returned;
t'was fun lacking accessibility-
writing with the same light Shakespeare burn'ed- 

A separate syllable for each "ed"
Is not the only anachronism.
For a blink in time, i felt not-dead,
but still yoked to 'existentialism'.

The day waned with a glimmer unreal;
All electronic toys back online,
Minus the joy of sharing the real deal-
Supplanted by the computer's toy whine.

I feel better about where we're going,
dwelling that instant in quiet feeling.

jts 110616

http://ExtinctionChronicles.blogspot.com 

http://JosephTStevens.blogspot.com 

http://stoanartst.blogspot.com

prohibited from AI sampling in any form

reprinted with permission; all rights reserved

Thursday, September 15, 2016

truth - an essay / lies · the sonnet


If i knew what truth was, i’d never be writing about it. So why use your precious time, or my heartache and confusion to pursue an impossibility? Without greater effort toward truth than found in today’s media, we may perish - not die in the sense of losing our puny lives, but perish as a species. Your resistance to that remark may be the clearest indication of its accuracy, not dissimilar to the look of lost love in a dear one’s eyes. Your heart knows the truth, but your hopes and dreams resist with all the power of desire. I cannot change another’s feelings, anymore than i can alter our collective fate. So i’m faced with the choice of continuing on my way using love as best i know how, or finding some justification within myself or for the other. (psychiatric jargon - rationalizing). While infinitely more useful to seek one’s own responsibility in the decay of a relationship, it is also more painful - who wants more pain, right? What if truth is not found in right or wrong - but simply the ability to see clearly and accept what is evident? For example if the capitalists are successful for no other reason than a clear vision of people’s weaknesses; what if all the oppression in the world is from humanity’s fear of freedom - not the sort of freedom found in a mobs’s ability to dominate, but the freedom that comes from learning to hear one’s self and then honor another’s hopes and desires as though they were one’s own? From a purely practical position, it makes more sense to expect good will from others, especially when anyone who has ever pursued a cherished dream would know there are enough internal doubts and demons with which to contend without piling on any fantasy of ill will from others; however, it is not practical to live one’s life preying on others and to than expect anything but a “reality sandwich” for lunch. The question gets back to what happens once the “look of love” is gone? If in that event i choose to become “right,” all the faults, reservations and quirks overlooked in the other while in love, become ample reasons to dethrone the “object of affection” (don’t get your knickers in a twist ladies - it is a euphemism) However, the truth about my euphemism is that it reflects reservations about my own indoctrination regarding women on pedestals rather than any lack of solidarity with any oppressed life form. That the accurate dialectics of enlightened feminist theory kicked over my lemonade stand in the process of my education, didn’t help, but what if she wasn’t wrong for extinguishing her “look of love”?

Right and wrong, don’t seem to be much help when searching for a way to recognize truth. What is of use? Are the clerics correct about an eternal nature defined by truth? I watched a computer animation of what it may look like when in about 4 billion years our galaxy, the Milky Way, collides with the Andromeda galaxy. The fact that an intelligence apparatus for an unnamed superpower republic in severe decay has foisted a “flat earth” hoax on hordes of undereducated frightened patriots who have surrounded themselves with proxy penises in the guise of ample armament makes it difficult to convey the enormity of such a collision. My first assumption watching this animation was of a molten cauldron of collapsed worlds, an assumption that turns out to be wrong. Our sun, because of its distance from our nearest counterpart Alpha Centauri and gaps in our part of the galaxy, we'll likely go unscathed - go figure. Truth, if it exists must be nearly as unfathomable, but no less unyielding in its reality; so how are we to visualize truth, and for why? Is the process, if there is a process as with the galaxy animation, a patient painstaking analysis of what is known using whatever accurate instruments we may have at our disposal? What if truth is more aligned with what the clerics assert - a timeless spiritual force shepherding us to a celestial afterlife worthy of killing and dying for? Of what use are our senses in pursuit of a spiritual reality, if we can more easily blame another for a loss of love than we would ourselves? I don’t know - I know the more i seek foundation in the heart of another for my own love the weaker my love is - what if g_d is no different. What if she, like the atoms within a scientist studying atoms at Cern, are simply g_d looking at herself? Rumi said, “you are not a drop in the ocean, but the ocean in a drop.” Is it truth that i’m simply passing time until my next drink and that writing cuts through the tangle of solitude better than the sick feeling of searching for a community that is made up of other lost souls waiting for a drink? Or have i looked out over the horizon as best my scared scarred heart is able and am resorting with my best effort to help anyone with similar questions? Just as plastic has no analog on our planet, neither do the social networks posing as community. All the social gatherings i’ve ever encountered good and bad, fall into similar cliques as you might find within internet “groups,” with a singular distinction; regardless of cultural tradition, if there is a “shot caller” at the gathering - everyone knows who he, or she is. This renown is recognizable by dress, attendants, or just the flow of sycophants to the seat-of-power - in the virtual community people converse with each other through the “filter” of that seat-of-power, not around it as has been the habit of human clusters. 

The obscuring of that filter has neutered our ability to pick and chose our conversations much less define their content. The insult of surveillance is simply an additional indication of the salacious despair of our technical lords and ladies. What else could describe a utility which when unleashed rather than enhancing human understanding has isolated us more and more from each other without rendering any deeper truths than saccharin memebytes made palatable by the delusion anyone will be changed by what anyone else posts. It remains plumage and coquetry, with another important distinction - we’re losing the capacity to feel, or more accurately losing the capacity to feel nuance. On the internet, it is not unusual to be chatting one minute and staring into aether the next. I am guilty and understand the complex demands of life. Take for example our fictional gathering and its “shot-caller,” were i chatting with someone one minute and found the next minute that same person knee deep in adulation with the shot-caller - that is good information about my companion's priorities. There is no similar gauge on the internet, if anything, the drive for anonymity and encryption only drives a further wedge into the personal responsibility necessary for integrity. Our deteriorating social fabric will not be made whole by hiding from each other, and i have no idea how to repair it. I know i do not want a corporate server sponsoring an avatar of myself - however well-intentioned. It is difficult enough making myself clear without wading through a minefield of algorithms. In the actual world, truth can often be found in what is not said, but with the deluge that is the data stream one begins to feel, if one doesn’t see evrything, something important might be missed. Could we have gotten any further from Frost’s “A Road Less Traveled” if we had burned his books in former Nazi Germany, soon to be Nazi USA?

Leonard Cohen - “I don’t give a damn about the truth, Baby except for the naked truth.” Is there any other truth than that which resides within our hearts. This morning i posted a video which seemed to correspond to my concept of the dangers of group-think, or more accurately the dangers of not thinking. On further research, i discovered the poster was affiliated with “Info Wars” - a site i consider divisive and self-serving. It is the re-telling of the “Emperor’s New Clothes” i aim at rather than being a tailor for the next monarch. The assertion and counter-assertion which embroils the oh-so-well-modulated internet is counterproductive. No reply i will ever make to a Trump supporter will dislodge that person from their conviction, for until that human decides there is no threat from without, s/he will never be able to see the demons consuming them from within. Noam Chomsky - “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” If our spectrum gets any narrower, we will be sipping our future through a straw. I do not subscribe to violence of any kind: mental, physical or spiritual; so how, as an avowed defender of the species, am i to dislodge armies, when googol barely allows 40 people to read my words; if you think googol is neutral, ask Bernie Sanders about that? The amazing lens which digital technology was supposed to have provided humanity is nothing more than a microscope hired-gun sold to the highest bidder to scrutinize the amoeba we have become to the ruling class. If we do not seize the technology and point that same lens back up the food chain to know the truth about our enemies, we will have allowed our existence to expire within a petri dish where we will have been experimented on, spliced into and made plump androids to be served up at the next new religious holiday celebrating NASDQ’s recovery; “I say it, so it must be so” - Bob Dylan.

Is there even such a thing as truth? The man i was 5 years ago doesn’t exist: 4 years, 3 years 2 seconds ago .  .  . I know damn sure i won’t survive to see our kind needlessly extinguished - so why bother? It is because of the magnificence of our world reflected through the beauty of our efforts. I have stood in front of a Cezanne painting transfixed in wonder at how he could have gotten so deeply into the essence of something, not just the color and light, but the actual “plink” of a ceramic cup or pitiless boredom of his wife - that to me is magic; i have felt similar wonder with Shakespeare’s awareness of the human heart, or Edith Piaf’s vocalization of pain. What might have happened with 7 billion human beings pursuing their capacity for such love to its fullest? I was raised in post-WW11 California; there was no San Diego freeway and one could still smell the dirt from dug fields that had not been depleted of its nutrients by the mongrels of our doom - Monsanto. Here’s a fact: all of the world’s food is grown in 2 inches (5.1 cm) - 8 inches (20 cm) of topsoil. Since 1974 1.8 million tons in the U.S., and 9.4 million tons have been sprayed worldwide - enough for 1/2 pound of glyphosate for every acre (.4 hectare) of arable land on the planet. Monsanto was recently bought by Bayer for $66 billion dollars. Glyphosate has been identified as a likely carcinogen, AND it doesn’t work - it only makes for bigger weeds. These are facts, and our president has signed an indemnity for our agent's of doom from prosecution - so if you get cancer from eating; brother that’s on you. Plastic - don’t even get me started on plastic.  .  . I have a few years left to me unless i’m assassinated for my beliefs. With that time i mean to cultivate love in my heart and peace around me. I will do this by writing, drawing maybe even carving some stone, not because i have anything important to share, but because it makes me feel good. It may be that all of our rational Western Civilization is as fake as this year’s American election; i cannot change that; what i can change is my feeling about it, so rather than be afraid, or saddened or any of the other inducements used to make me buy things i don’t need, i will use my time to develop my work such that someone i will never know, might feel something; it is all i have to give, and it will have to be enough.

Post Script - The entire body of work from Joseph T Stevens’ identified as “stone carvings” are subject to this caveat into perpetuity : owner or ownership entity will not have financial ties greater than 50% of their net worth contained in whole or in part within any financial instrument subject to, or controlled by the richest .01% (HNWI) of the planet’s financial apparatus.*

* I D K, how do you spell " h u b r i s " ?

+-+-+-+-+- 

lies - the sonnet

Good lies are sweet; the best lies are sweeter.
“I need you” was too sweet for my three wives.
Should i’ve said “i love you, make me better”?
I miss them - hope them well in their new lives.

The conceit they’d improve me was my own
Born of a faith my love was not enough.
True too, all they could see was what i’d shown-
A hurt boy hiding self-hate by being tough.

Did i lie to them by needing someone?
Yes and no - it was my self with the need
for a love i had sought from anyone,
but mostly found we all share the same greed.

i love you now without expectation,
for truth is not the heart’s limitation

_˚)                        

jts 15/9/2016

http://ExtinctionChronicles.blogspot.com 

http://JosephTStevens.blogspot.com 

http://stoanartst.blogspot.com

prohibited from AI sampling in any form

reprinted with permission; all rights reserved





















Tuesday, September 13, 2016

war · an essay / peace - the sonnet


war · an essay -

Today is 11 September 2016; fifteen years ago, mayhem rained death down on nearly 3,000 human spirits in New York City - regardless of purpose, or cowardly origin - nothing will ever change the fact, chew on that for a while .  .  .

It sickens me to think what might have happened had the mayhem stopped right then; some reading are shouting 'fuckin-A-right', slamming their fists against the sky; i know, because i was then howling with blood lust - i must have spent 1 full month from my short life absorbed by the aftermath of this tragedy shooting a computer pop-up Bin Laden dead - a month i will never get back. This loss of mine is a paltry sum compared to the 4-5 million human beings slaughtered in retribution for the 2,996 lives lost that sad day - for the math challenged that is a nearly 1,666... fold increase in carnage. Without knowing a living soul who has suffered such agony as leaping from a burning building to their death, i would venture a guess few from that horrid day would wish the same for any other human being - much less a 1,666 others - for any reason, ever. At the same time i indulged my own bloodthirsty vengeance repeatedly destroying that CIA dupe, Bin Laden. Our planet was nearly universal in its condemnation of the carnage, most especially our muslim brothers and sisters whose sphincters were likely clutching from an unconscious visceral awareness of what would happen next - what would and did happen. Not one human life lost in New York City has been resurrected, and the human suffering has only increased exponentially. Why is this? To what end are we gorging ourselves on the delusion that more murder will end murder? Who has benefited from the derailment from all of humanity’s better service? Do you think one family affected by 9/11 wouldn’t happily trade every one of those 4,500,000+ human beings slaughtered since that day for just 10 minutes more with a lost, loved one? That is a question. .  . I know i’d happily return any of those lives taken for the month out of my life I wasted killing my Osama Bin Laden avatar, over and over .  . there is no answer, but if you listen to your heart, you know what you would do.


What is this curtain that has fallen over the hearts of our kind? Some will say, what curtain - “as long as man has existed, so has war”. This isn’t exactly true; for 100s of thousands of years we morbidly fragile creatures clustered together developing cooperative practices which allowed us to prevail over much more powerful antagonists - wild boars, kangaroos, drought etc. Even after a skirmish with other humanoids, there was no percentage in pursuing, much less, decimating any marauding band. “Get the fuck out of my face” seemed to suffice for much longer in human history than “death to the infidels,” has, or ever will. We don’t have that much history left to us, it would seem, by those same shadowy characters profiting from our continued self-slaughter. Who are these mooks making book on our deaths? I’d have never made a good soldier taking orders from somebody hiding in a bunker, but that’s just me. It is in large part why i question this zeal that we consider anyone an enemy, let alone, everyone. When i am asked to hate on another person, especially someone i know not, i listen very carefully. After too long, whatever camaraderie used to seize my allegiance becomes overshadowed by the petitioner’s personal agenda. Sometimes i have to listen for a long time - hatred is pernicious like that, tarry, gooey and slow to boil. But once it gets on you, it is a hard thing to scrape off - just like the commander with medals of valor and glint in his eye. Eventually the tarnish fades and the glint becomes flinty, usually around the time i ask my first question. Somehow there’s a relationship between obedience and compliance that muddies the waters between friend and foe. Alexander the Great was a leader of men; while it is true he killed with barely restrained ardor, friend and foe alike. It was he, Alexander who first established the convention of shaving - this because he saw his men being pulled by their beards into the sword point. But Alexander was different than those who’ve amassed the entirety of our world’s wealth hiding behind puppets on a string representing the will of we the people - an important distinction, for today’s Alexanders could give a shit whose sword point you get pulled into - theirs or by your own hand.

Much 'hay, moolah, profit, baksheesh, filthy lucre has been made on how proficient we’ve become at death; how we are able to protect ourselves in the pitch of battle, or according to General George Patton - “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.” - the same general who slapped two PTSD patients in WWII Sicily, calling them “cowards.” The Wikipedia reading gets more interesting when psychiatry - hand maiden to the war machine, same breed as the consultants in Guantanamo giving torture expertise - began to understand if men were not removed at the early stages of PTSD, they were lost to the “theater of war” for longer periods, or entirely. It’s not so much that the “chicken hawks” in charge give a shit about warriors, but more a staffing question. It takes more time to train a soldier than give that soldier relief from the rigors of war - a relief i’d be willing to bet large sums of money is parsed down to the nano second, not unlike the $24 aspirin you might find in any emergency room throughout the U.S. You begin to see how difficult it would be for me in a military circumstance; it would be difficult to take orders from someone who cannot see exactly who the enemy is. Bruce Lee says to become one with the enemy, but that is from a deeply Taoist tradition which abhors war; Bruce Lee also said, ”It is compassion rather than the principle of justice which can guard us against being unjust to our fellow men.” Those marketing the drones are neither compassionate nor just - just greedy. The act of killing is oozing from the hatred of our leaders demanding what Richard Nixon proudly proclaimed, “Peace with Honor.” There is no honor found in war, or in killing. This is why Lao Tzu advocated approaching victory the way one might attend a funeral. If we haven’t become numb to death we will soon have occasion, for the amoral amongst us have declared war on life - they are winning.

Or more accurately, 'we' are losing. Anyone who has an infant, or child in their care knows exactly how much more dangerous our world has become since those same parents were young. I may not be soldier material, but i shall not be vanquished - not by greed, hatred or delusion - not willingly. My enemy is anything that pales the beauty of a happy woman, or the luster of boulders in a mountain stream. Children’s laughter is the most precious sound on our planet, yet we are allowing that blessing to be cultivated by the same 'digital screen' tearing them from us and we from one another. Just as the gore of death is filtered through a remote screen, so too have we become unplugged from the gut feel necessary to fully understand death and what it means to kill another. Ted Nugent, aside - the abnormal psychology of someone hiding his penis behind an arsenal is not my idea of killing, i’m far more inclined to learn the killing language of the indigenous people wherein permission and gratitude are the central alter from which life taken, as opposed to the blood lust of one raised in a Walmart - yes the same of Walton fame and “fortune.” That i’m not soldier material does not mean i’m not full with warrior blood - any human alive possesses this quality of character just by arriving this far down the human chain. It is a modern conceit to obscure the very real difficulty of life behind a cavalcade of convenience; which as it happens only really aids a handful of people while the balance of humanity is left footing the bill. It is that sort of stupidity against which i apply my cunning and fading strength as a warrior scholar. I do not oppose war, i oppose death, destruction and dishonesty. For these reasons, i ally myself with any who oppose cruelty, conniving and coercion. I have comrades; we are not alone and with patience, decency of spirit will prevail, because these qualities of the human spirit have fought the hardest to get this far in the gene pool. The myth of might is a charade of appearance - like the brashness of those most afraid. This is clearly seen in the faceless exploits of those who have poisoned our world and stolen our time without the backbone to take credit.

The first objective of war is to survive, but contrary to General Patton’s tactical error - another’s death is a weak objective. In the killing of one, you are only sewing the seeds of your own destruction, or that of your family. That is fact; nor is it possible to winnow the opposition into manageable proportions. Once you have committed your resources to destruction, you have absented efforts from the more powerful outcomes gained by learning, training and personal application - more facts. Any army based on death and destruction will never be a match for one born of concern for the greater good and welfare of all. The experts, those hired and told what to say, knowingly or unknowingly, by our corporate overlords are feasting on your quiescence. The whores of media enjoy a rich existence of prestige, and celebrity because you have allowed them this stature - they serve at your pleasure. The instant humanity turns a deaf ear to the fiction that we are at war with anything but our own ignorance - war will end. I’ve hated, deliberately and with a burning fervor to my own great detriment - as with my lost month assassinating into oblivion the digital avatar of Osama Bin Laden; i will never recapture that time. I’d like to say i am wiser for it, but that would be a lie just like believing these words come from a place of peace. I am not at peace - i war with every fiber of my being that which wants to surrender and relinquish any second of this life not devoted to helping my family, my friends even my enemies to survive the next 1,000 years. Enlightened self-interest is our friend - to believe the death of another by my hand or by my silence cannot be enlightened, for it runs counter to our instinct to survive. Not one of you reading this doubts the adage of “do unto others, as you’d have done to you,” those that scoff by saying “do unto others, before they do unto you,” are either afraid or sociopathic. We were not born afraid, we were born roaring, and those who care not for others have already lost the war for meaning - their heart voided with possessions and a trail of havoc neither of which will ever be enough. While the warrior scholars legion to which i aspire will have won the war when and if one person reading this finds something of use, for “to the victor goes the spoils.”    

+-+-+-+-+- 

peace - the sonnet ·

“Tuesday Afternoon” use to give me peace
Until i learned that it was just in song;
Castles don't come without a long term lease.
'Forever' helps me know how time is long.

I’d just as soon bring along a good friend-
A peaceful one - one 'you’d' spend a day with.
I’ve comrades - all warriors i’d defend.
Blood was never let from peace to spilleth.

And to my brothers, by this news chagrined
Blame me not, it is nothing personal.
I will go elsewhere, even though i’ve sinned, 
Without vanquished souls as collateral?

What if our planet is part of heaven
and all who've been 'offed, were angel brethren?

jts 13/09/2016

http://JosephTStevens.blogspot.com 

http://stoanartst.blogspot.com

prohibited from AI sampling in any form

reprinted with permission; all rights reserved

Friday, September 9, 2016

ami / ennemi - le sonnet


«L'amitié est la chose la plus difficile dans le monde à expliquer. Ce n'est pas quelque chose que vous apprenez à l'école. Mais si vous ne l'avez pas appris le sens de l'amitié, vous avez vraiment rien appris. »- Muhammad Ali

J'ai des amis je ne l'ai jamais rencontré; je ne sais pas comment cela est arrivé, mais il est aussi certain que je suis assis et écrire. je suis pas non plus obligé de les traquer avec ma gratitude; il peut être qu'ils sont des amis pour cette seule raison. Je ne sais pas. Je dois beaucoup plus de reconnaissance à ceux que je suis assez chanceux d'inclure comme des amis. Ma vie a été mieux de leurs soins, parfois même l'absence de celui-ci. Il peut être l'exhaustivité j'ai trouvé dans l'amitié que je trouve très utile - ils savent vos conneries, et il est correct. Je me suis souvent lutté avec cette limitation de mon propre caractère, comme si l'on peut éviscérer le goût désagréable d'un de monde et donc de soi-même. Mes meilleurs amis me l'ont rappelé de la compassion que j'avais perdu le ressentiment, la fureur, la douleur et les milliers d'autres irritations sous la contrainte de l'homme par la trahison, l'indifférence ou toute manifestation de l'illusion que l'on n'a pas le choix. J'ai entendu "un ami est un cadeau que vous vous donnez», ainsi que «un ami est quelqu'un qui partage la douleur et double la joie". Il y a des millions d'homélies sur l'amitié, on peut lire en essayant de comprendre "ce qui est arrivé à tous mes amis?" Dans les banlieues Californie hautement socialisées de ma jeunesse, l'école était tout aussi balkanisé que rien trouvé dans les guerres serbo-croate de la début des années 90. La principale distinction étant, il y avait peu de gens de couleur pour nettoyer, donc pas la différence "Lord of the Flies," cliques formées et fixées les unes sur les autres avec une ferveur similaire trouvée sur cette île. Selon le point de vue de l'un, cette fois dans ma vie heureusement correspondait à la contre-culture de l'époque du kaléidoscope 60 de hippiedom. De nos parents point de vue, il ne pouvait pas être facile à entendre leur murmure de descendance ricanant sous leur souffle "tuer tout le monde sur 30." La hausse devrait être que pour un instant dans le temps "une fraternité de l'homme" est devenu presque visible - un point dans le temps qui démêlé avec des affaires de drogue qui a mal tourné et les ravages de substances tuant vos frères. Il ne semble pas aider beaucoup que sur les mêmes gonzesses de temps est tombé malade de la connerie de la fraternité et avec raison soulevé le noble drapeau de "fraternité" - elle-même soumise aux pièges de toute noblesse.

Mais l'homme que j'ai eu quelques bons amis, mâle / femelle - animales, minérales et spirituelle. Je ne pourrai jamais oublier le regard dans les yeux de mon père quand Jimmy B______, un vagabond passant par de New York se hissa sur le toit de notre crashpad et backflipped 12 pieds à la terre - en continuant sa conversation avec mon père comme si rien était. Pop avait été un gymnaste à l'école et son expression était l'un des profonde égard - un sentiment que je suis souvent a considérer mes amis proches. Il y avait une magie à cette époque, qui manifeste une synergie inattendue. Par exemple dans la même cour backflipped humungous où le fou parmi nous avaient marché sur des charbons trop ivres ou trop fidèles aux soins, 12 d'entre nous et un frisbee se tenait dans un cercle qui sillonnent le disque, quand en quelque sorte le cercle a commencé à tourner et pour une inexplicable période de temps le cercle a tenu et filé aussi vite que 12 jeunes puissant pourrait fonctionner. Grâce à la brume du temps - je suis presque convaincu moi-même le frisbee jamais tombé; si elle l'a fait, il n'a pas été souvent ou longtemps. . . Je suis sûr que l'élan est le même adrénaline trouvé par les «maîtres de scripts" viaducs mise à l'échelle dans le monde d'aujourd'hui. Cependant, la camaraderie est à risque dans notre temps présent en raison de l'atomisation de notre tissu social. Cela peut venir à la suite de la «grande migration» sur les autoroutes de l'information dans la réalité virtuelle - si vous n'êtes pas trouvé sur l'écran - qui êtes-vous? Mon point de vue sur cette question ne naît pas de requêtes informatiques, mais est une sensation viscérale informée de l'échange humain direct. Je ne peux pas imaginer à quel point il doit être difficile pour les jeunes d'aujourd'hui pour évaluer une personne à partir d'une liste imposée, non pas par des normes humaines, mais des normes clickbait de tout réseau social essayant de commander le trafic nécessaire pour obtenir plus de revenus et une plus grande publicité. Pourtant, tout comme le vieil adage français, "plus les choisit changent, plus RESTENT Elles les mèmes. Avec la liste des amis de numérotation 1000 de, pour un savoir qui sont ses amis est encore plus important maintenant que jamais. Rosetta Tharpe a chanté, "ne prennent pas tout le monde à être votre ami", mais est presque noyé dans le zèle pour trouver la reconnaissance de sa propre valeur dans les badlands de l'Internet. La vérité reste cependant le même, on ne peut pas être un ami à personne jusqu'à ce qu'on trouve l'amitié en soi-même, pour une fois que cela arrive - tout ami trouvé devient un heureux hasard, et tout ami perdu devient encore une leçon sur l'importance de la patience.

Tout comme la confusion de 60 Californie comme un adolescent, «terroristes-under-chaque-lit" d'aujourd'hui fureur brouille les traditions humaines à un point où ils deviennent presque méconnaissables - la loyauté trahie par les tentations de grandes piles de l'argent à proximité de grandes piles de médicaments, ou à l'intégrité perdue à la célébrité musicale instantanée et la fortune. Mais cette trempe des valeurs humaines est pas nouvelle à notre nature; Aaron Swartz aurait été un héros pour toute période de l'histoire humaine dont je suis conscient. Il est réconfortant de croire que cette qualité de l'altruisme peut être trouvé dans les amis i ai maintenant et ceux que j'ai pas encore rencontré. J'ai toujours été améliorée par l'amitié - être celle de la déception dans mon propre caractère, ou vice versa. La portée d'une amitié est souvent définie par des moments difficiles - les rigueurs de la vie, ou comme Cliff S______ aimait à le dire, "il est pas tout le gâteau et la crème glacée;" Oui, comme une question de fait, je ne me casser la main frapper un mur après qu'il est venu sur ma première épouse, bien avant notre mariage; Pourquoi demandez-vous? En toute justice pour lui, et compatible avec la complexité de l'amitié - qui était l'une des leçons les plus importantes dans ma vie; je frappe plus des murs, des amis peut-être - mais jamais les murs. La chimère de internetedness tord complexité de nos différences humaines dans une forme plus ressemblant au processus de normalisation d'une base de données, que la réalité qui était Cliff et ses valeurs douteuses. La loyauté est risquée et en partie pourquoi pour moi cette question de l'amitié tient une telle fascination - qu'est-ce d'être fidèle? Quel est le rôle de ce concept insaisissable avoir à notre espèce? Tout comme le gain personnel alors tenté tout "frère avec la dope», aujourd'hui baser un milliard de dollars sans visage, plus des affaires sur la fidélité de marque et le comportement du clavier prévisible est fou, mais comprend le divertissement seulement Googol pourrait fournir par mutation «ne pas faire le mal" en "faire connaître le mal. "

Il est peut-être le désir de trop d'amis est une menace aussi semblable que la cupidité et la tentation sont à sa valeur intrinsèque - plus encore que rien trouvé dans les mythes hippie? Je ne sais pas. Que dire alors de la partition qui Larry G_____ sagely observée entre ami et connaissance - même Larry qui a répondu à la question «comment avez-vous tant ami?" - "J'ai une scie à table." Si nous voulons limiter le nombre de les êtres humains que nous appelons «ami» à ceux qui sont le plus complet dans leur acceptation de nos attributs, bonnes et mauvaises - ce de la multitude de l'humanité à la recherche de la proximité de la société qui fait partie de notre nature après des dizaines de milliers d'années assis à la maison feux racontant des histoires des amours de nos ancêtres et des batailles sur l'amour? Un ami est rare, mais des gens sympathiques ne sont pas. Il est une innovation récente de la classe dirigeante de nous, on divise de manière efficace de l'autre pour des motifs superficiels comme la race, la profession, l'éducation ou même sexe? L'ironie pour moi est comment nous avons été si bien divisé en étant simultanément attelés à l'aspect le plus faux de nos gouvernants - leur argent. Je choisis un ami basé sur la sincérité de leur comportement - bon ou mauvais. Tout ce que je peux comprendre de ceux qui mènent, est la cohérence de leur demande que je me suis absous de choix - conservatrice / libérale, on est à peu près le même que l'autre. Un bon ami peut avoir une opinion différente de la mienne, mais tentera d'élever ma conscience plutôt que commande l'obéissance. Je ne suis pas bon ami, mes opinions sont devenues des vaches sacrées qui, dans mon désespoir je tiens à ne pas très différente de celle d'un bébé affamé à un tit vide. Mais je suis chanceux, car j'ai réussi à prendre des amis et connaissances, plus sage que moi-même. Auparavant, je choisirais des amis plus populaire que je percevais être moi-même. Peut-être que je pensais que la popularité était contagieuse. À un certain point le coût de la fidélité à une telle superficialité est devenu plus grand que le coût du respect de soi. Une partie de l'odyssée de se lier d'amitié avec comprend un inventaire complet de soi-même, ou ce que Leonard Cohen a décrit comme un premier temps mon catalogue auto était composé presque exclusivement de traits positifs "recherche amère du coeur." - Résidu d'un déni pernicieux de l'auto répugnance. On pouvait s'y attendre, les amis des beaux jours est tombé au mois de mars de temps avec de moins en moins disponible pour commisération mon innocence.

Il se trouve que, après je me suis arrêté moi bullshitting, j'étais celui qui tient les autres à un niveau plus élevé que i appliqué à moi-même - pas très sympa. «La conscience de chaque homme est vil et dépravé. Vous ne pouvez pas compter sur elle pour être votre guide, quand il est vous qui doit le garder satisfait »-. Bob Dylan. Il a été dit que les livres sont les plus proches des amis et le meilleur des conseillers; i faudrait ajouter de la musique à cet adage. Au début de ma sœur m'a donné C.G. «L'homme et ses symboles" de Jung qui discute longuement une obscurité que j'étais longtemps incapable de comprendre, dans mon état sans amis, tout ce que je pouvais voir autour de moi était le bonheur et la fraternité de l'homme. Je en voulais profondément que i seul semblait soumis à la trahison, la déception et les promesses non tenues - ceci après avoir doigts la ligne irréaliste défini par ma liste de traits supérieurs. G_d dans sa sagesse enseigne avec une patience infinie, qui dans mon cas était vraiment nécessaire. "Donc, vous voulez sculpter de belles statues afin d'avoir des gens que vous aimez? D'accord, mais le savoir - avec votre vision en deux dimensions qui est va être un peu difficile "Essayez comme je pourrais, elle avait raison -. Il est sacrément près impossible de faire un objet en trois dimensions quand tout ce que vous pouvez voir est une surface plane. Qui étais I Gonna pleurnicher à ce sujet? Elle m'a dit la vérité; i ignoré ce que je savais dans mon propre cœur. Il n'y avait personne à blâmer, mais moi-même; il n'y avait personne pour pardonner, mais moi-même. Comment pourrais-je faire cela, je ne l'avais pas fait quelque chose de mal? G_d a été fait non plus avec moi; combien d'autres imperfections étaient là? Si mon édifice sacro-saint de raison d'être était pas plus d'une faim émotionnelle insatisfaite utilisée pour inclure et exclure les gens de ma vie, qu'est-ce donc? Trop tard, il n'y a pas d'obtenir des chevaux à l'intérieur une fois que putain de porte de la grange est fermée. J'ai eu plus personne pour se lier d'amitié, mais moi-même si je pouvais ou ne pouvais pas sculpter des statues avec brio, aimer énormément, la peur ou de la haine sans relâche avec un mépris à mon propre bien-être. Je ne sais toujours pas qui les amis sont là-bas j'ai pas encore trouvé; mais je suis assez sûr, je ne suis pas la seule personne sur la planète avec des rêves brisés, la fureur non résolue ou un amour qui ne veut pas quitter.

+ - + - + - + - + -

ennemi - le sonnet

Qui est ami qui est l'ennemi, je veux savoir?
Qui n'a pas - est-il important plus?
Je considère que ceux qui verraient ma mort - ennemi;
et ceux ami - qui trouvent dans les plus Amor.

Ben Laden ne voulait pas me voir mort;
ce serait un sur un déclencheur nucléaire,
ou ceux qui prendraient l'or, et de payer avec du plomb.
Il est pas l'islam qui empoisonne l'eau.

Jésus n'a pas non plus tuer et aller au ciel.
Dur comme de la baise est de savoir - il est de ma faute,
i qui prient et comme mon pain sans levain.
Qui pourrait voir la vérité dans un coffre-fort?

La triste vérité est mon seul ennemi
sur la terre causant le plus grand mal, est moi.

amigo / enemigo - el soneto; en español


"La amistad es lo más difícil en el mundo de explicar. No es algo que se aprende en la escuela. Pero si usted no ha aprendido el significado de la amistad, que realmente han aprendido nada. "- Muhammad Ali

Tengo amigos que nunca he conocido; No sé cómo sucedió, pero es tan cierto como me siento y escribo. Tampoco estoy obligado a seguirles la pista con mi agradecimiento; puede ser que son amigos sólo por este motivo. No lo sé. Le debo mucho más que agradecimiento a los que tengo la suerte de incluir como amigos. Mi vida se ha hecho algo mejor de su cuidado, a veces incluso la falta de ella. Puede que la integridad que he encontrado en la amistad que me parece más útil - saben su bullshit, y que está bien. A menudo he luchado con esa limitación de mi propio carácter, como si uno puede eviscerar el sabor desagradable del mundo de uno y por lo tanto de uno mismo. Mis mejores amigos me han recordado la compasión que había perdido al resentimiento, furia, el dolor y los miles de otras irritaciones de la coacción de los seres humanos a través de la traición, la indiferencia o cualquier manifestación de la ilusión de que uno no tiene elección. He oído "un amigo es un regalo que usted se da", así como "un amigo es alguien que divide la pena y duplica la alegría". Hay millones de homilías sobre la amistad se puede leer cuando se trata de comprender "lo que pasó a todos mis amigos?" En los suburbios altamente socializados California de mi juventud, la escuela era tan balcanizado como cualquier cosa que se encuentra en las guerras serbo-croatas de la principios de los 90. La principal distinción había pocas personas de color para limpiar, por lo que no se diferencia de "El Señor de las Moscas" camarillas forman y establecen una sobre la otra con un fervor similar que se encuentra en esa isla. Dependiendo de la perspectiva de uno, esta vez en mi vida felizmente se correspondía con el calidoscopio de 60 época contracultura de hippismo. Desde nuestro punto de vista de los padres, que no pudo haber sido fácil para escuchar su murmullo progenie burlonamente en voz baja "matar a todos los mayores de 30." La ventaja tendría que ser que por un instante en el tiempo ", una hermandad del hombre" se hizo casi visible - una paja en el momento en que se deshizo con ofertas de drogas que salió mal y los estragos de las sustancias que matan fuera de sus hermanos. No parece ayudar mucho eso de las mismas tías tiempo se enfermó de la mierda de hermandad y con buena razón planteó la noble bandera de "hermandad" - sí sujetos a las trampas de cualquier nobleza.

Pero el hombre que tenía algunos buenos amigos, macho / hembra - animales, minerales y espiritual. Nunca olvidaré la mirada en los ojos de mi padre cuando Jimmy B______, un vagabundo que pasa a través de la ciudad de Nueva York se izó hasta el techo de nuestra crashpad y backflipped 12 pies a tierra - la continuación de su conversación con mi padre como si nada hubiera sucedido. Pop había sido un gimnasta en la escuela y su expresión era de profunda relación - una sensación que he menudo había teniendo en cuenta mis amigos más cercanos. Hubo un mágico en ese momento que se manifiesta sinergia inesperada. Por ejemplo, en el mismo patio backflipped Humungous donde el loco entre nosotros habían caminado sobre carbones demasiado borracho o demasiado fieles a la atención, 12 de nosotros y un disco volador se puso de pie en un círculo entrecruzando el disco, cuando de alguna manera el círculo comenzó a girar y por un inexplicable período de tiempo el círculo llevó a cabo y se volvió tan rápido como 12 jóvenes de gran alcance podría funcionar. A través de la bruma del tiempo - casi me he convencido de que el disco volador nunca cayó; si lo hiciera, no era a menudo o por mucho tiempo. . . Estoy seguro de que élan es la misma adrenalina encontrado por los "maestros de la escritura" pasos superiores de escala en el mundo actual. Sin embargo, la camaradería está en riesgo en nuestro tiempo presente debido a la atomización de nuestro tejido social. Esto puede venir como resultado de la "gran migración" en la autopista de la información en la realidad virtual - si no se encuentran en la pantalla - ¿quién es usted? Mi opinión sobre la misma no nace de las consultas de ordenador, pero es una sensación visceral informado de intercambio humano directo. No me puedo imaginar lo difícil que debe ser para los jóvenes de hoy para evaluar a una persona de una lista impuesta, no para los estándares humanos, pero a partir de los estándares clickbait de cualquier red social intentar mandar el tráfico necesario para garantizar más y mayores ingresos por publicidad. Sin embargo, al igual que el viejo dicho francés ", además les choses Changent, además de elles restent les mêmes. Con las listas de amigos de numeración de 1.000, por uno para saber quiénes son los amigos de uno son que es aún más importante ahora que nunca. Rosetta Tharpe cantó, "no tome todo el mundo para ser su amigo", pero está a punto de ahogarse en el afán de encontrar el reconocimiento de la propia autoestima en las tierras baldías de internet. Verdad, sin embargo sigue siendo el mismo, no se puede ser un amigo a nadie hasta que uno encuentra la amistad dentro de uno mismo, para una vez que sucede - cualquier amigo encontró convierte serendipia, y cualquier amigo perdió convierte en una lección más en la importancia de la paciencia.

Al igual que la confusión de los años 60 California, como un adolescente, de hoy "terroristas-bajo-cada-cama" furia difumina las tradiciones humanas a un punto donde se convierten casi irreconocible - lealtad traicionado por las tentaciones de grandes fajos de billetes en las proximidades de grandes pilas de fármacos, o la integridad perdió a la fama musical instantánea y la fortuna. Pero este temple de los valores humanos no es nuevo para nuestra especie; Aaron Swartz habría sido un héroe para cualquier período de la historia humana de la que soy consciente. Es alentador para creer que esta cualidad de la generosidad se puede encontrar en los amigos que ahora tengo y los que todavía tengo que cumplir. Siempre he sido mejorada por la amistad - es que a partir de la decepción en mi propio carácter, o viceversa. El alcance de una amistad es a menudo definida por tiempos difíciles - los rigores de la vida, o como Acantilado S______ le gustaba decir, "no todo es pastel y helado;" Sí, como cuestión de hecho, me hizo romper mi mano golpear una pared después de que llegó a mi primera mujer, aunque antes de nuestro matrimonio; ¿por que lo preguntas? Para ser justos con él, y en consonancia con la complejidad de la amistad - que fue una de las lecciones más importantes de mi vida; Ya no golpee las paredes, los amigos tal vez - pero nunca paredes. La quimera de internetedness tuerce complejidades de nuestras diferencias humanas en una forma que se asemeja más al proceso de normalización de una base de datos, que la realidad era que Cliff y sus valores poco fiables. La lealtad es incierta y en parte por eso para mí este tema de la amistad tiene tanta fascinación - ¿qué es ser leal? ¿Qué papel tiene que elusivo concepto tiene por qué nuestra especie? Del mismo modo que la ganancia personal, entonces la tentación de cualquier "hermano con la droga", hoy de basar un rostro mil millones de dólares, más negocio fidelidad de marca y comportamiento del teclado predecible es una locura, pero incluye entretenimiento solamente un Googol podría proporcionar mediante la mutación de "no hacer el mal" en "hacer conocer el mal ".

Puede que sea el deseo de muchos amigos es una amenaza tan similares como la codicia y la tentación son al propio valor intrínseco - incluso más que cualquier cosa que se encuentra en los mitos hippie? No lo sé. Lo que a continuación de la partición de la que Larry G_____ observó sabiamente como entre amigos y conocidos - el mismo Larry quien respondió cuando se le preguntó "¿cómo tiene tantos amigo?" - "Tengo una sierra de mesa." Si hemos de limitar el número de los seres humanos que llamamos "amigo" a aquellos que son más completos en su aceptación de nuestros atributos, buenas y malas - lo de la multitud de la humanidad que busca la cercanía de la sociedad que forma parte de nuestra naturaleza después de que decenas de miles de años sentado en su casa incendios que relatan historias de amores de nuestros antepasados ​​y batallas sobre el amor? Un amigo es raro, pero gente amable no lo son. Es una innovación reciente de la clase dominante para nosotros, uno dividir de manera efectiva desde el otro por motivos tales como la raza superficiales, ocupación, educación o incluso de género? La ironía para mí es cómo hemos sido dividida tan a fondo y al mismo tiempo ser uncido al aspecto más falsa de nuestros gobernantes - su dinero. Elijo un amigo sobre la base de la sinceridad de su comportamiento - bueno o malo. Todo lo que puedo deducir de aquellos que llevan, es la consistencia de su demanda de que yo me absuelvo de elección - conservador / liberal, uno es más o menos lo mismo que el otro. Un buen amigo puede tener una opinión diferente a la mía, pero intentará levantar la conciencia en lugar de la obediencia de comandos. No soy tan buen amigo, por mis opiniones se han convertido en las vacas sagradas que en mi desesperación que no se adhieren muy diferente a un bebé hambriento en una teta vacía. Pero tengo suerte, porque de alguna manera han logrado recoger, amigos y conocidos, más inteligente que yo. Lo que solía ser yo escogería amigos más popular que percibí yo a ser. Tal vez, pensé que su popularidad era contagiosa. En algún momento el coste de la lealtad a la superficialidad tales llegó a ser mayor que el costo de la autoestima. Una parte de la odisea de hacerse amigo de uno mismo incluye un inventario exhaustivo de uno mismo, o lo que Leonard Cohen ha descrito como un principio mi auto catálogo se compone casi exclusivamente de rasgos positivos "amarga búsqueda del corazón." - Residuos de una negación perniciosa de auto- aversión. Como era de esperar, los amigos de buen tiempo se redujo a la marcha del tiempo, con cada vez menos disponible para commiserate mi inocencia.

Resulta que, después de que dejó de bullshitting a mí mismo, yo era el que sostiene a otros a un nivel más alto que apliqué a mí mismo - no muy agradable. "Conciencia de cada hombre es vil y depravado. No se puede confiar en él para ser su guía, cuando eres tú quien debe mantenerlo satisfecho. "- Bob Dylan. Se ha dicho que los libros son el más cercano de amigos y el mejor de los consejeros; me habría que añadir música a ese adagio. Al principio de mi hermana me dio C. G. de Jung "El hombre y sus símbolos", que analiza en profundidad una oscuridad que yo era incapaz de comprender larga, porque en mi estado sin amigos, todo lo que podía ver a mi alrededor era felicidad y la fraternidad del hombre. Me molestó profundamente que por sí solo que parecía sujeta a la traición, la decepción y promesas rotas - esto después de haber punta de la línea realista se define en mi lista de rasgos superiores. Ds en su sabiduría enseña con una paciencia infinita, que en mi caso era realmente necesario. "Así que usted quiere tallar estatuas hermosas con el fin de tener la gente te quiere? Está bien, pero saber esto - con sus dos visión dimensional que va a ser un poco difícil "más que trataba, ella tenía razón -. Es maldito casi imposible hacer que un objeto tridimensional cuando todo lo que se puede ver es una superficie plana. ¿Quién era yo que va a gemido al respecto? Ella me dijo la verdad; no hice caso de lo que sabía en mi propio corazón. No había nadie a quien culpar, sino a mí mismo; Así que no había que perdonar, sino a mí mismo. ¿Cómo podría hacer eso, yo no había hecho nada malo? Tampoco se hizo Ds conmigo; cuántas otras imperfecciones eran? Si mi edificio sacrosanto de la razón de ser no era más que un hambre emocional insatisfecha utilizado para incluir y excluir a las personas de mi vida, ¿entonces qué? Demasiado tarde, no hay manera de algunos caballos de vuelta en el interior una vez que la puerta del granero de puta está cerrado. No tenía a nadie dejó de hacerse amigo, pero yo si podría o no podría tallar estatuas de manera brillante, el amor enormemente, el miedo o el odio implacable con indiferencia a mi propio bienestar. Todavía no sé quiénes son los amigos están ahí fuera todavía tengo que encontrar; pero estoy bastante seguro, no soy la única persona en el planeta con los sueños rotos, la furia sin resolver o un amor que no acaba de dejar de fumar.

+ - + - + - + - + -

enemigo - el soneto


¿Quién es amigo quién es enemigo, quiero saber?
¿Quién no - Qué importa más?
Considero que los que me vieses muertos - enemigo;
y aquellos amigo - que se encuentran dentro de más Amor.

Bin Laden no quería verme muerto;
que sería uno en un gatillo nuclear,
o los que tomarían el oro, y pagar con plomo.
No es el Islam que envenena el agua.

Tampoco Jesús matar e ir al cielo.
Duro como la mierda que es saber - que es mi culpa,
i que rezan y le gusta mi pan sin levadura.
¿Quién podría ver la verdad en una bóveda?

La triste verdad es que mi único enemigo
en la tierra que causan el mayor daño, soy yo.